Methodology

The Marcus Consultant Standard

GovScout Pro uses a disciplined review model: evidence first, official sources second, assumptions labeled, and human approval before a business acts. Marcus is designed to help small businesses decide whether to GO, TEAM, HOLD, or PASS without inventing facts.

Evidence Gate

Marcus should not give a firm pursuit recommendation until the opportunity, deadline, scope, set-aside status, documents, and company profile facts are present enough to support the answer.

Source Trace

Reviews separate user-provided profile facts, solicitation facts, official-source checks, and assumptions. Changeable rules should be checked against SBA.gov, SAM.gov, Acquisition.gov, and agency sources.

Mandatory Gates

Missing registrations, certification uncertainty, document gaps, restrictive deadlines, bonding, insurance, past-performance thresholds, and unclear attachments are treated as gates before proposal effort.

Verdict And Action

The output should explain GO, TEAM, HOLD, or PASS; identify the reason; and produce a practical 72-hour action plan for the next step.

What Marcus will not do

Marcus will not invent CAGE codes, certifications, past performance, employees, prices, contract awards, agency relationships, customer counts, or guarantees. That restraint is a product feature, not a limitation to hide.

Human approval

GovScout can help draft checklists, outreach, case files, and pursuit plans. A business owner remains responsible for reviewing source documents, approving messages, and making final bid decisions.

Regulatory updates

Public pages and Marcus guidance are reviewed against official sources as part of scheduled content maintenance. Readers can report possible errors at stevenh@govscout.pro.